A Sequel That Remembers the Clothes, but Forgets the Journey
When I first heard about The Devil Wears Prada 2, I was genuinely excited. The original wasn’t just a movie about fashion—it was about ambition, identity, and the price of success.
This time, though, I couldn’t shake the feeling that luxury brands—Dior among them—are benefiting far more from the movie than the movie benefits from them.
The film constantly tells us that fashion matters. That magazines still matter. That luxury brands represent culture rather than just expensive clothing.
The problem?
It keeps telling us these things, but almost never showing us why we should believe them.
And as a wannabe screenwriter, this is probably where the movie lost me the most.
Beautiful Words… Without the Story to Support Them
Throughout the movie, the characters repeatedly insist that fashion is an art form and that a printed magazine still has value in a digital world.
One of the movie’s central ideas is that fashion is more than clothing.
It argues that a printed fashion magazine is more than marketing—that it represents culture, creativity, and artistic vision in an increasingly digital world.
That is a fascinating idea.
The problem is that the film mostly talks about it instead of demonstrating it.
I actually wanted the movie to convince me.
Instead, it simply expected me to agree.
The ideas stay on the surface. They’re presented almost like slogans, but they rarely become part of the characters’ actions or the dramatic conflict.
A story shouldn’t just state its themes.
It should make us experience them.
Where Is the Conflict?
One thing kept bothering me while I was watching:
Nothing ever truly falls apart.
Andy is still an excellent writer.
Everyone knows she’s talented.
Everyone says she’s talented.
And, unsurprisingly, her talent ends up solving the central conflict.
It all feels… a little too convenient.
There’s no major failure.
No moment where she completely loses her footing.
No point where it genuinely feels like everything she’s built is about to collapse.
The central conflict is resolved largely because she happens to be exactly the writer everyone needs.
The solution feels convenient rather than earned.
Without meaningful failure, success loses much of its emotional weight.
Nostalgia Can’t Carry a Sequel
Sequels naturally rely on nostalgia.
We return because we already love these characters.
But nostalgia should be the invitation—not the entire movie.
A sequel needs its own dramatic journey.
Its own emotional reason to exist.
Here, I never really found one.
The characters mostly stay exactly where they started.
One of the reasons the original film worked so well is because Andy changed.
She entered the fashion world unsure of herself, skeptical of everything around her, and slowly discovered both her strengths and the price of ambition.
She had something to learn.
Here, that journey is already complete before the movie even begins.
Andy already knows who she is.
She already knows what she’s capable of.
She doesn’t discover anything fundamentally new about herself.
She simply walks from point A to point B.
Without change, there is no real character arc.
Miranda… Softer?
One thing I actually found interesting was Miranda.
Or rather…
how everyone keeps saying she’s changing.
Because honestly?
I didn’t feel like Miranda became softer.
She just looked tired.
There’s a difference.
The first movie slowly revealed the vulnerable woman behind the impossible editor.
Here, it feels less like emotional growth and more like someone who’s simply exhausted after fighting the same battles for years.
Ironically, that was one of the most believable parts of the movie.
The Conversation I Actually Wanted to See
The biggest missed opportunity comes near the end.
The entire resolution depends on convincing Sasha—the one person capable of saving the magazine.
And then…
The movie skips the conversation.
Really?
That’s the scene I wanted.
I wanted to hear the arguments.
I wanted someone to explain why this magazine still deserves to exist.
Why fashion matters.
Why people should care.
Why preserving this world is worth fighting for.
Instead, the film jumps straight to the result.
As a viewer, I felt cheated out of what could have been the movie’s strongest scene.
Does the Movie Justify Luxury?
Oddly enough…
No.
One thing I kept waiting for was a deeper discussion about fashion itself.
Can luxury still justify its prices?
The film spends two hours surrounded by some of the world’s biggest luxury brands.
Yet by the end, I still don’t understand why these products deserve their enormous prices.
Nor does the movie truly convince me why printed fashion magazines still hold a unique place in today’s world.
Those questions are raised repeatedly.
They’re simply never explored.
And that feels like a missed opportunity because these ideas could have given the sequel its own identity instead of relying on memories of the original.
Final Thoughts
I didn’t dislike The Devil Wears Prada 2.
I just kept waiting for it to become deeper than it actually was.
It talks about fashion.
It talks about journalism.
It talks about legacy.
But too often, it talks instead of showing.
And that’s disappointing, because the original film understood something this sequel seems to forget:
Great stories aren’t built on beautiful speeches.
They’re built on difficult choices.
And in this sequel, very few choices actually feel difficult.
Seeing these characters again is genuinely enjoyable.
But enjoyment alone isn’t enough to justify a sequel.
A sequel should deepen something.
It should challenge its characters, reveal new sides of them, or offer a fresh perspective on the world they inhabit.
Instead, this film mostly reminds us why we loved the first one.
And while nostalgia can make us smile, it cannot replace meaningful storytelling.
Because a sequel shouldn’t simply ask us to return.
It should give us a reason to stay.
Leave a Reply